I know there are limited lenders if you buy a property, refurb it and then sell it within six months, but if I pay cash for a property and want to spend about £10k max on the refurb to turn it into 4-room lets for professionals before getting some money back out and renting the property out, is this feasible?
Buying for cash if you can is positive because you have:
Having four tenants on separate AST's will reduce your choice of BTL lenders as some only allow a single AST let.
The majority of BTL lenders will not accept a remortgage application until you have owned the property for six months, regardless of your method of purchase. There are a couple that will lend limit lending primarily to purchase price and provable refurb spend, thus trapping perhaps more money in the property than you intend.
Is bridging finance calculated on a deal-to-deal basis, rather than an individual’s mortgageability? What would I have to demonstrate to be successful in getting a bridging loan?
Bridging has a completely different underwriting process to mortgages. Mortgages are income-based lending for the medium to long term; whilst bridging is asset based lending for the short term.
The actual terms are determined on a deal-to-deal basis, as is the bridgers decision to lend or not to lend on a specific property, regardless of the fact that they are happy to lend to you as a person.
Invariably, bridgers will deduct the monthly interest at the drawdown of the loan (Retained Interest), so making monthly payments is rarely a consideration.
If you can demonstrate more than one exit route that will play well with bridgers.
Getting the term right is important as you want to be in a position to repay your bridging loan early, or at least on time. I assist all my...
A good friend of mine has just exchanged on two properties at auction yesterday. The properties are leasehold apartments with a long term lease on them for 15 years from 2007.
He’s looking for a good mortgage broker who could provide a mortgage on the two properties that can be turned around within the auction timescales of 28 days? He can pass any credit hurdles and has financial backing, but would like to finance the majority with a mortgage.
My brokerage can obtain bridging finance from one of our lenders to enable your friend to meet the 28 day deadline. You’ll find that traditional BTL mortgages can’t fulfil the 28 day term.
To complete this purchase within the required 28 days, he will have only two ways to realistically hit that timescale, cash or bridging finance. However, he may decide that completing on the sale will only compound the problem he has created for himself.
Assuming I have correctly understood that your friend has...
One of my landlords, whose property I manage for him, has voiced an idea that he wants to sell his 5-bed property – and suggested I might like to buy it.
It cash flows well and we have another 10 doors down. The demand is strong so it’s a no brainer really; I just need to concentrate on financing.
My question is has anyone already gone through this scenario, and how did you do it? My thinking especially now is to purchase it as a limited company.
To address how to finance this, let’s examine what will and won’t work.
Mainstream BTL lenders, will not lend on a property with 5 unrelated tenants each on a separate AST; most only lend on a single AST, a few will go up to 4 but 5 is outside of their criteria. They also don’t lend to limited companies.
This means that your only option is to use specialist or commercial lenders who, coincidentally, are happy to lend to limited companies.
Expect to borrow 75% with relative...
I have been sourcing properties now for nearly 12 months and now I am looking to buy my first property to flip or rent, but I would like to clarify the processes I need to go through.
I am looking to buy a 3-bed terrace and split it in to two 1-bed apartments. Can I split the title through permitted development? What costs are there in this?
I want to use a money in/money out strategy via bridging – what is your advice?
First things first, this is not a Permitted Development deal; to convert a house to flats requires Planning Permission. Many landlords have just gone ahead and carried out a conversion without planning approval, unaware that they have just made their property unmortgageable; no lender will give a mortgage on an illegal conversion. (This is one of the goldmine categories of unmortgageable properties that I teach investors to make outrageous offers on at my workshops, as it is cash buyer territory only.)
So the first step...
What is the best way of purchasing an auction property and then refinancing it after the refurb work has been done?
The guide price is 200k, but this property has the potential to become eight self-contained units generating £400 pm cash flow each after a bit of work (£15-25k). I have about 25k for deposit and a partner who would potentially put in the same, but was wondering the best way to go about doing this.
Could I use a commercial mortgage for the refinance?
I have financed plenty of these types of deal, this may help you:
I've had an offer of £87,000 accepted on a property that, once it's had a light refurb, should be valued at £120,000. Following the mortgage valuation the mortgage company have come back to me and said they are holding a full retention until the kitchen and bathroom have been replaced, but they really aren't that bad. I've seen much worse and had mortgages for much worse in the past. How can I get round this?
It looks like you have fallen foul of the differing definition of mortgageable that applies to main res or BTL properties. Lots of investors fall for that one too.
Because it has a kitchen and bathroom of sorts, you believe it to be habitable and thus mortgageable and you would be right if it was your main residence you were looking to mortgage.
However, for an investment property that will be let out a different level of habitability is required – it has to be rentable, not just habitable. In other words, the...
I have found a high street property with great fundamentals and a very healthy rental yield.
It is in a very impressive listed (grade 2) building with 10 flats. On the ground floor are two commercial properties - a Sainsbury’s local and a major bank.
The flat I am looking at is on the third floor of this building with windows facing onto the high street (double glazing in the bedroom).
Should I be concerned about being above commercial in this situation? Obviously being right in the centre of town provides good fundamentals, but is there likely to be a problem being above these commercial businesses?
My strategy is long term - however I obviously am looking at potential sale in future and don't want to limit my market.
It is impossible not to limit your options on this property. A significant number of BTL lenders will decline to lend on flats above commercial. This is simply because, as always, they have the end game in mind;...
I am aiming to buy a freehold BTL property that has three separate flats. I am unable to find a mortgage provider who will give a mortgage on this type of property. I was advised that I must have three separate leases in order to get a mortgage.
How can I get a mortgage on this property?
It’s no surprise that you are having trouble finding a lender for this; BTL lenders have a very 'vanilla' approach to what they want to lend on. This is based on their view of the worst case scenario i.e. how easily could they dispose of it if they had to repossess it? They look for properties with broad market appeal. Mostly, if it is not a regular freehold house let on a single AST, they start to put up the barriers.
These ‘unmarketable’ properties include:
The lender I’m with has revised their lending criteria to exclude the mortgage I have had with them and I’ve reached the end of term and need to remortgage.
The property is a studio flat with 63 years lease remaining, value £65k with 40k outstanding, but it is less than 30sq m.
What do you recommend?
You have two problems..
The majority of lenders set 30sq m as their minimum space threshold based on their belief that the marketability diminishes significantly below that figure i.e. it is so small it turns off potential buyers. However, there is not much you can do to increase its size.
Lenders get very jittery about short leases (anything less than 75 years), also due to the reduced marketability. In a stagnant market, the flat will decline in value as each year ticks down until the lease expires. Typically they can require anything from 25 to 45 years...